-castellano-.pdf - David Irving - Hitler----s War-la Guerra De Hitler

A 5th edition was published in 2018 in Colombia, indicating that the book continues to be reprinted and distributed in the region.

Despite being discredited by mainstream historians, Hitler’s War remains a significant artifact.

The Spanish edition, La guerra de Hitler , is a direct translation of the original English text. There is no change in content or argument. A 5th edition was published in 2018 in

The historical consensus, however, overwhelmingly refutes this. Scholars such as Ian Kershaw, Richard J. Evans, and Christopher Browning have demonstrated that Hitler was not only aware but actively involved in the radicalization of anti-Jewish policy. Evans, who served as an expert witness in Irving’s 2000 libel suit against Deborah Lipstadt, systematically dismantled Irving’s misuse of sources. For example, Irving omits key entries from Goebbels’ diaries that reference Hitler’s direct approval of deportations and exterminations. He also misrepresents the timing and content of Hitler’s speeches, such as the January 30, 1939, Reichstag address, where Hitler explicitly threatened the “annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe.”

If you read Spanish and want a serious, evidence-based account of Hitler’s role in the war and Holocaust, consider these works instead of Irving’s PDF: There is no change in content or argument

La tesis más controvertida del libro es la presentación de Hitler no como el principal instigador de cada detalle de la guerra, sino como un líder a menudo desconectado o, en ciertos aspectos, moderado, cuyas órdenes eran malinterpretadas o ejecutadas por subordinados como Himmler o Göring.

It portrays Hitler as a rational, intelligent politician who was often let down by incompetent or treasonous subordinates. lack of objectivity

The publication of "Hitler's War" in 1977 sparked intense debate and criticism from the historical community. Many scholars and historians have rejected Irving's claims, citing overwhelming evidence to the contrary. The book has been widely criticized for its methodological flaws, lack of objectivity, and promotion of Holocaust denial.